We're living in a world where truth is being redefined.
Who ever thought that truth wouldn't necessarily be universally true?
Wouldn't be absolute.
Wouldn't be universal.
That it would be defined by the reader/listener and not by the author.
What is true for some may not be true for others?
I guess this is what happens when God is rejected as the author of truth.
Not only rejected as the author of truth but as the embodiment of Truth.
If He is the embodiment of Truth then only He can disseminate truth to other - that outside of Him there is no truth?

I understand that there have been differing interpretations of theology, but are we living by interpretations or revelation?
Can interpretations be accurate?
Can we live only by revelation?
How do we know if one man's interpretation is simply that and another man's interpretation is by revelation?
Is it possible to discern the difference?
What are we living by?
Whose teaching is personal interpretation and whose is revelation?

Mat 4:4

Jesus answered, "It is written: 'Man does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.'"

Truth is found in God.
Jesus is called the Truth.
Can we then say that to find truth on any given subject we need to get revelation from God, personally, on it?